![]() ![]() It offers the ability to set up a circuit with a graphical user interface and simulate the large-signal, small-signal and noise behaviour of the circuit. Octave remains an area of interest but there is a lot of work to do to get a working Simulink-like for it.Quite Universal Circuit Simulator (Qucs) is a free-software electronics circuit simulator software application released under GPL. ![]() There are a good number of alternatives for Simulink especially in the area of low level circuit design but of the ones I have tried Scilab/Xcos have functionality closest to Simulink. Using the plot command the following figure was produced: In order to plot the results I imported them into Octave using the load command (the filename should be ). The simulation is then run with ngspice (by clicking on the cog icon). This is where I feel that the Octave interface would be best placed as we have all of the parameters set up, but none of the actual simulation has been done. OPTIONS NOPAGE NUMDGT=6 UNITS=Degrees WIDTH=104 This produces the following: * Component Definitions There are multiple ways to input the simulation parameters, but my preferred method is with gspiceui. The 1 picoOhm resistor is required to ensure that the capacitor doesn’t produce unexpected errors. In order to demonstrate why I think that gEDA provides a good starting point for a GNU Octave-based Simulink-like solution, I shall use a simple example.įirst, I created a circuit schematic using gschem and went for a simple RC circuit with a 5 volt power supply. This last requirement has no easy solution and will mean manually writing the function library. Once the netlist is obtained, it then remains for it to be able to be interpreted by Octave via a function. ![]() Gschem already allows users to create custom circuit symbols and as it uses information light symbols, we can add Octave-specific information and still get the netlist via gnetlist. The modularity of the gEDA suite allows the possibility to co-opt some of its functionality to provide the first two requirements. There are three main requirements of a Simulink-like for Octave: firstly it has to have an intuitive user interface to allow for easy editing and good readability secondly the information contained in the block diagram need to be sent to Octave in a way that it can understand and finally, a library of blocks and corresponding functions. GNU Octave has powerful numerical tools, so hypothetically it is able to run simulations, but is impractical to do so as it would require the end user to write large new scripts for each simulation. Each of these programs have their own strengths and weaknesses but for an open source Simulink-like Scilab’s Xcos is the clear favorite at this time. The gEDA suite is a collection of compatible programs for electronic design and simulation it operates by producing a schematic with gschem and exporting it to ngspice via gnelist and gspiceui.Qucs is a circuit simulator, that whilst still a work in progress, is a good tool for many circuit based applications.Scilab is another Matlab analogue but unlike Octave it already has a Simulink like package Xcos.Here is a brief outline of the ones that I came across: There are a number of packages that offer open source Simulink-like functionality outside of Octave. Octave is of particular interest as it is made to be similar to Matlab, to allow for easy porting between them. GNU Octave is an open source Matlab alternative, however, it lacks a Simulink-like companion program. ![]() I’m a mathematics graduate and for the past two weeks I’ve been an intern with Embecosm, charged with looking into open source alternatives to Matlab and Simulink, particularly for silicon chip modeling. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |